FrostyTech.com Heatsink Reviews and Analysis
      
TOP 5 Heat Sinks     TOP 5 Low Profile Heat Sinks     TOP 5 Liquid Coolers    
 Reviews + Articless     News     HSF Mfg's Index     Advanced Search    

Nanocomposite Thermal Compound Review
Nanocomposite Thermal Compound Review
  0%   
Abstract: In this day and age, it isn't good enough to just have the fastest fan and biggest heatsink. Attention must be paid to the little things in life...

 Company link  Category  Published  Author 
ESG   Cooling / Heatsinks   Aug 27, 2001   Max Page  


Nanocomposite Thermal Compound Review


In this day and age, it isn't good enough to just have the fastest fan and biggest heatsink. Attention must be paid to the little things in life, and in particular, the few hundredths of an inch between the processor die and the base of a mounted heatsink.

If you skimp on this tiny area, you might be in trouble down the road because of over-heating. So if you've been starring at the monkey trying to decide to punch it or not, stop looking around and pay attention to what I'm about to say!

Current AMD processor cores expose their silicon backsides to the world. Now while these surfaces are very finely finished, the heatsinks they meet up to mate with are not always so lucky. Hence, to improve thermal conduction between these two surfaces, and to remove any small air pockets that would hinder such optimal conduction, thermal compound is used.

Unlike salsa on the nachos, or ketchup on a street dog, it's best to use the least possible amount of thermal compound on your processors core (and only the core). Don't squeeze on mountains of thermal goo, and for heck's sake, don't cover the entire top of the processor in thermal compound!!!

Some compounds are electrically conductive (ie. silver-based materials) so this could potentially short out an AMD processor which has exposed electrical contact on the surface. Silver-base compound does naturally have some of the best thermal conduction properties out there, but depending on what you get, silicon-based, or nonsilicon-based materials and be quite good as well. Whatever the material, it is important to remember this, thermal compound is only a good thermal conductor relative to air. Compared to copper, aluminum, silver, or heck even lead, thermal compounds fall short - significantly. But if you stack up that hundredth of an inch against a comparable space of air, the thermal compound will shine brightly.

One of the newest materials to hit the streets is Nanocomposite thermal compound from www.esgn.com Associates. The exact materials that make up this super-goo are under lock and key, but in a matter of moments we shall see first hand how it stacks up to a motley assortment of thermal compounds we happen to have on hand.

The competitors:

Thermal Compound Description Available
Nanotherm Ice Nanocomposite thermal compound, non-silicon based. www.esgn.com
Nanotherm Blue Nanocomposite thermal compound, non-silicon based. www.esgn.com
OCZ Silver goo Silver-based thermal compound. www.ocztech.com
Stars 700 Generic 25% silver-based thermal compound. Comes standard with Fortis heatsinks. N/A
White Generic Thermal Compound Silicon-based generic material, no tech data available N/A
Results Check No thermal compound, bare metal to metal. N/A

Note: At the time of this review we did not have any Arctic Silver II on hand to include in the comparison. The test was conducted using the FrostyTech Synthetic Temperature test platform, the small copper die template, and the Vantec CCK-6035 Retail heatsink.

The Results:

Thermal Compound Temperature
Nanotherm Blue 56.1
Nanotherm Ice 56.7
Stars 700 55.5
OCZ Silver Goo 55.8
White Generic Compound 55.4
Results Check 69.8

Well, what can be gathered from these rather undifferentiated set of results? First of all, it looks like that 25% silver goo that comes with the Fortis heatsinks isn't that bad at all. The most surprising result would have to be the generic white compound (came with the Akasa Silver Mountain). I'm a little surprised that it managed to come in on par with the rest of the compounds frankly. The Nanotherm compounds came in very well, and for a non-silver compound hold their own. Does one compound blow all the others away? Judging by the numbers not really, but the newcomer(www.esgn.com ) does present a viable alternative to ye old standard - and hey, we're partial to the blue colour!



Follow Frostytech on FacebookFrostytech News RSS FeedFollow frostytech on Twitter
Resources
° Got Feedback?
° Mk.II Test Platform
° Where To Buy?
° Manufacturer Index
° Industry Dir.
° Cooling Projects

DeepCool Maelstrom 240 Liquid Cooling System Review

DeepCool Gamer Storm Lucifer K2 Heatsink Review

Gelid Antarctica Heatsink Review

Noctua NH-D9L 3U Low Noise Heatsink Review

BeQuiet Shadow Rock LP Heatsink Review

IBM Watson Analytics for Heatsink Test Data
...More Articles >>




Websites you may also like:
PCSTATS

Google Search Frostytech

Time stamped: 11:37PM, 06.28.2017
In Case You Missed it...
°  Cooler Master MasterLiquid Pro 280 Liquid CPU Cooler Review

°  ID-COOLING Releases SE-214L Series CPU Coolers

°  Antec A40 Pro & C400 Air Cooler Review

°  ECLIPSE ADVANCE 900 series CPU cooler

°  LEPA NEOllusion RGB CPU Cooler Review

°  Cooling module maker CCI starts production at new factory in China




FrostyTech.com
Since June 1999


Find a Heatsink / RSS Feeds
Latest Heatsink Reviews
Top 5 Heatsinks Tested
News RSS Feed
Reviews RSS Feed


Social Media
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest


FrostyTech.com Info
Feedback
Contact Us / Heatsink Submissions
Submit News
Legal
Suite 66
© Copyright 1999-2017 www.frostytech.com All Rights Reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of Use
Images © FrostyTech.com and may not be reproduced without express written permission.
Current students and faculty of accredited Universities may use Frostytech images in research papers and thesis, provided each image is attributed.